Looking Forward: Expectations for the NFL Salary Cap

Updated: June 23rd 2022

Covid issues created unique salary cap problems for the NFL following the 2020 season.  The NFL salary cap unexpectedly dropped substantially after significant NFL revenue losses in 2020.  The article details a brief history of recent cap progression to the current state and what we can expect in the future.  The writing also examines how Reality Sports Online GMs may take advantage of the changing cap.

What happened?

Many teams played with near-empty stadiums primarily due to state Covid restrictions drastically reducing ticket and game day revenue while also seeing TV ratings dip in 2020.  This resulted in the NFL losing approximately $3 to $4 billion in revenue that season.  The NFL collective bargaining agreement (CBA) dictated those losses applied to the following year’s salary cap which would have resulted in the cap dropping by about $70 to $80 million in 2021.  NFL owners and the NFL Players Association, however, came to an agreement in which those losses would be spread out over a three year period instead of the single year.  In effect, the NFL would have three seasons of relatively modest below-market salary caps versus one year with a massive salary cap reduction.  This move mitigated potentially disastrous team salary cap problems throughout the league and kept players from seeing drastic salary reduction in 2021.

What does the Salary Cap look like going forward?

The NFL salary cap averaged about 7% annual growth in the seven years before the 2021 season.  The 2020 CBA increased player revenue shares to 48%+ in 2021 and going forward while an anticipated new TV deal was also expected to raise revenue significantly.   An 8.5% annual growth in the NFL salary cap for the near-term future was a reasonable projection prior to the 2020 season.  The new TV contract, sports betting deals, and potential international expansion may result in even bigger increases.

The chart below displays some of the effects on expectations to the salary cap due to the decreased revenues of 2021 and projections going forward using growth estimates stated above.  The NFL salary cap decreased from $198.2 million in 2020 to $182.5 million in 2021.  While this was only about a $16 million cap decrease, it also probably translated to approximately $30 or $35 million less cap space than NFL teams were planning for before 2020.  The 2022 cap is set to grow a hearty 14% from 2021 but the cap will still be far below what was expected previously.  2023 will show much the same.  These cap decreases have had real NFL consequences, particularly for those teams who were already up against the cap and essentially borrowing against future cap to pay for current player production.  New Orleans and Dallas, for example, were forced to trade individuals (Amari Cooper) for little compensation or allow players to hit free agency (Terron Armstead) they would have preferred to keep if not for cap restraints.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual and Projected NFL Salary Cap 2020-2025

Things get back to normal in 2024, in terms of the salary cap, as the 2020 revenue losses will have been fully accounted for after the 2023 season.  One consequence of this is that 2024 should see an enormous spike in the league salary cap with $40 to $50 million cap increases possible depending on further adjustments.  We have already seen teams calibrating for this reality by heavily back-loading contracts (more than normal) and increasing the usage of “dummy” contract years (items such as voided years at the end of the contract in which the player won’t actually play on the contract but serves as a way to extend cap accounting into the future).

The Los Angeles Rams provide a nice example of this.  Many question how the Rams keep paying big money extensions to players on the team.  They are simply using the rules of cap accounting and taking into account the expected explosion in future team cap.  Matthew Stafford’s contract contains cap hits of just $13.5 million and $20 million in 2022 and 2023, respectively, then balloons to about $50 million per year in future seasons.  Aaron Donald’s new contract added multiple voided years at the end of the deal to help spread his signing bonus over.

What this means for Reality Sports Online GMs

As most Reality Sports Online (RSO) GMs know, RSO mirrors the NFL salary cap in that the NFL salary cap equals the RSO salary cap.  This means we can also expect the RSO salary cap to also dramatically increase over the next few seasons.  The previous Salary Cap Chart from above shows expected cap growth rates of 11% (2023), 19% (2024), and 8.5% (2025 and forward).  Let us see how this compares to RSO contracts.  RSO multi-year deals distribute the total value of a contract based on the number of years resulting in small salary escalations (between 6% and 10%) in each subsequent year.  The four-year contract example from RSO is detailed below starting in 2022 with expected salary cap figures from our previous estimates.

Reality Sports Online Example Contract (4 year / $100 million total value)

“Expected Cap % “is the RSO salary divided by the expected cap. Most notably, compare the RSO contract salary growth rates with the expected cap growth rates above. The NFL Salary cap shows much higher expected growth than the contract salaries. The RSO example contract salary displays a 27% growth rate from year one to four while the salary cap is expected to rise by 43 percent during that period. This results in salaries taking a smaller portion of the expected total cap during the later contract years. In other words, the real expected yearly value of the RSO contract rises as the contract progresses.

The biggest takeaway for RSO GMs is that they should be more willing to invest in long-term contracts than ever before. Acquiring new multi-year deals in free agency and trading expiring contracts for existing long-term contracts should be a strategy focus for many teams. Hits on locked multi-year contract deals could become more valuable with time and misses make for more palatable release candidates with less cap consequences.


Bio: Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics. He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time. Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

More Analysis by Bernard Faller

2022 RSO Writer’s League Rookie Draft

Updated: May 16th 2022

Rookie drafts for Reality Sports Online teams involve a number of considerations different than a normal dynasty league.  Selected rookies are typically given three or four year contracts at, hopefully, a below market contract.  RSO GMs then have the option of extending a player with franchise tags, extensions, or final year options (depending on the chosen settings in your league) which usually are near or above market value for a given player.  This makes the initial rookie contract years potentially extremely valuable and the real measure of worth for a rookie player.

The RSO Writer’s League recently finished our three round rookie draft with results posted below. The league is a 10-team Superflex PPR format.  This article analyzes some general thoughts on the draft in comparison to other drafts and my own pick decisions along with a couple of other interesting players.

Writer’s League Draft

Overall Draft Thoughts

The Writer’s league draft likely mirrors other drafts in many ways.  The players of picks 1-7 probably remain the same in most formats, in some order, with maybe one or two surprises sneaking in.  Likewise, the 8-13 tier in this draft represents players likely seen in most superflex drafts for this range.  Things get very interesting afterwards.  I wouldn’t be surprised by any of around fifteen to twenty names go next in the draft, a true crap-shoot.  It’s a very broad tier of players where team fit and individual evaluation will drive selections.  This group is highlighted with role-specific running backs, 3rd round NFL quarterbacks who might never be even the short-term answers, and the top tight ends who are notoriously slow developing for fantasy football.

It’s also worth comparing this rookie class to last year’s group.  The lack of legitimate starting quarterback prospects really lowers the potential of a rookie class in superflex leagues.  One could reasonably make the argument that every 1st round pick from 2021 would be in consideration for a top-five spot in this year’s draft.  The afore-mentioned lack of highly drafted quarterbacks contributes to some intriguing dart throws potentially available in the 3rd round of drafts.  Willis and Ridder offer excellent athletic upside (and with it fantasy upside) if they ever get starting QB consideration by their teams.  The sheer amount of mid-round running backs taken by the NFL in this year’s draft makes for a lot of potential committee backs with significant chances of some relevance for fantasy leagues.

Notes on Selected Picks

1.08, Kenny Pickett QB

Pickett earns the distinction as the only quarterback selected in the first round of the NFL draft with the 20th selection by the Pittsburgh Steelers.  He could start as early as this season with an uninspiring Steelers quarterback depth chart.  The Pittsburgh product showed excellent accuracy on and off platform.  Pickett made one of the most dramatic leaps we have ever seen from a college quarterback.  The following excerpt from PFF’s Draft Guide displays just how big of an improvement Pickett made last season.

There are a host of potential downsides.  The question is was last season a one year wonder?  Pickett provides adequate arm strength and mobility but nothing that will “wow” anyone while also struggling with pressure at times.  Does he possess a fantasy ceiling of more than a moderately useful QB2?  Pittsburgh might also end unexpectedly bad in a stacked AFC leading to a high draft pick next season.  NFL teams have shown a willingness to move on quickly from these mid-first type quarterbacks if they don’t pan out.  That makes his job security very questionable at this stage.

1.10, Skyy Moore WR

My first pick ended up with the new Kansas City wide receiver, my WR6 both pre and post-NFL Draft.  The Central Michigan product and James Jones favorite gets to play with one of the top quarterbacks in the league on his rookie deal. Moore brings inside outside versatility despite a smaller frame with a solid build, big confident hands, and explosive play-making routes.  He rated among the top wide receivers in the draft for open percentage and catch rate statistics per The Analyst.  There’s also room for improvement to Moore’s game as he only converted to wide receiver in college.  The Kansas City provides lots of opportunity, especially after this season, as all the primary wide receivers are in the final contract year or have contract outs after the 2022 season.

The major concern with Moore, and small school prospects in general, is how they translate to the NFL after winning against lesser athletic competition in college.  Moore’s 4.41 forty-time and elite-level 10-yard split helps alleviate that concern to a degree by showing off enough athleticism to win at the next level.

2.02, Jahan Dotson WR

Dotson seems a player that the NFL was always higher on when compared to the fantasy community.  Multiple reports predicted him going in the first round before the draft.  Dotson is another smaller receiver who nonetheless played a lot in the outside in college (a lot more than players like Burks and London).  Many film analysts grade Dotson with the best hands in the draft and he had to utilize those skills regularly thanks to some of the worst college quarterbacking from a major school last year.  The former Penn State star produced a fabulous third year and could have entered the draft after it if he wanted. He should start immediately for the Commanders and Washington doesn’t have anything locked in at wide receiver for the future as Terry McLaurin still has no extension.

Size likely presents obstacles to Dotson ever becoming an upper-level after-the-catch receiver and also showed up as an issue when faced with physical corners.  His college contested wins may not materialize against bigger, more athletic corners in the NFL.

2.03, James Cook  RB

Cook is easily one of the most fascinating players in rookie drafts.  Most draft analysts considered Cook a mid round undersized committee back at the NFL level. He routinely went in the late second round of fantasy drafts before surprising second round draft capital by the Buffalo Bills but has seen a meteoric rise since.  This is as late as I have seen him go in rookie drafts after the NFL draft.  Cook rates as the top receiving back by many.  He looks a lot like his brother Dalvin when running outside showing off easy speed and fluid movement skills.

The real question for Cook is what role he plays for the Bills.  Is Buffalo expecting a primary back, a role he never played in college and one we don’t see often at his size?  Will he be primarily used on passing downs? If so, Buffalo ranked bottom-five in running back target percentage the last two seasons when Josh Allen emerged as a top quarterback.  The Bills clearly wanted to upgrade the receiving back position after signing J.D. McKissic before he backed out of the deal.  Is Allen suddenly going to be a lower depth-of-target thrower and reduce his role near the endzone?  Overall, there are a lot of questions on what Cook actually does for Buffalo and how that translates to fantasy football but also a ton of upside if he takes a big role on a top-tier offense.


Bio:  Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics.  He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time.  Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

More Analysis by Bernard Faller

RSO Decision: Extensions

Updated: October 18th 2021

The decision of whether to extend a player or not is one of the crucial points for Reality Sports Online managers.  This article focuses on the decision-making process for RSO managers which utilize the extension option in their leagues.  We examine many of the key factors in determining whether to extend a player and choosing between different options.  In particular, this piece utilizes a real-life example from my RSO Writer’s League team in which I have narrowed my extension contract choices to Josh Allen and Tyreek Hill.

Projected Player Values

The extension decision-process starts with a comparison of player values versus contract costs.  Allen was the 2020 overall QB1 last season in fantasy scoring for our league and currently the 2021 QB4 while Hill was the WR2 in 2020 and 2021. I calculated each of the players with similar production value at over $50 million per year for the 2020 and 2021 seasons so far.  Allen’s offered extension contract is 4 years at $108 million for an average value of $27 million per season while Hill’s is 4 years at $176 million for an average value of $44 million per season placing each among the top-5 priced contract at their respective positions.  That makes each player’s extension a below-market value if they continue at their recent production profile into the future but Allen’s extension contract offers a lot more possible surplus value.  This extra value surplus on Allen’s contract also necessarily reduces the risk due to injuries or underperformance in future years and adds more roster flexibility.

Projected Franchise Tag Alternative

Many leagues utilize RSO’s franchise tag option which allows your team to keep an expiring contract. The cost is the average of the top-5 players at a position in the first season with options of 20% and 44% increases in years 2 and 3 over the previous year’s contract cost, subject to certain conditions.  Allen’s extension price projects at $24 million the first season while Hill is expected at about $39 million.  The franchise tag currently calculates to $25 million in 2022 for quarterbacks and about $36 million for wide receivers.  These prices are particularly noteworthy for Hill.  Hill’s first two years of his extension offer project at about the same cost as two franchise tags.  Hill will be 30 after the 2023 season which is an age where fantasy players generally start to devalue wide receivers. This makes the franchise tag a particularly appealing option for Hill in this case.  Allen, on the other hand, will have just started his prime years as a quarterback which makes the extension offer more attractive.

Free Agent Alternatives and Salary Cap

The projected free agent pool also bears some thought as possible future replacements for players.  Keep in mind other teams may also franchise tag or extend players so the free agent pool will typically be shallower than the pool currently projected as free agents.  Brady, Rodgers, Cousins, Ryan, and Tannehill are the only realistic possibilities at quarterback in this league while Cooks, Woods, Julio Jones, D.J. Moore, and Kenny Golladay are among the top options at wide receiver.

The player pool has little meaning without looking at what the projected costs of free agents will be.  The projected cap space in this league is over $700 million which presents a huge amount available to spend on the top free agents potentially pushing prices above market values.  This factor adds weight to using extensions or franchise tags on players at or below market prices in my case.  One must also look at the impact of extensions on your own team’s salary cap.  Teams up against the salary cap ceiling in future years may have trouble fitting in large extension contracts.

Extension Value Changes

RSO extension offers may change throughout the season taking into account weekly performance.  This might lead an RSO GM to consider waiting on possible better contract offers throughout the season or jumping on one perceived as below-value.  The extension offers for Hill and Allen did not change the first two weeks despite Hill coming off a huge week four performance and Allen, conversely, producing a big week five outing.  This leads me to expect that the extension offers, which are near the top of market, likely remain similar throughout the year unless something catastrophic happens.

Final Decision

The article displays a number of key factors in deciding between alternative RSO contract extensions.  The combination of extension length and price strongly points toward an Allen extension in this particular example while the franchise tag presents an attractive alternative for Hill.


Bio:  Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics.  He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time.  Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

More Analysis by Bernard Faller

2018 Rookie RSO Extension Candidates

Updated: September 26th 2021

The 2018 NFL rookie class plays the final year of four-year contracts in the NFL and most Reality Sports Online leagues this season.  These players represent extension candidates (among others on the final year of their RSO contracts) for RSO managers which utilize the extension option in their leagues.  This article examines the 2018 rookie class as to suitability for RSO extensions.  It also provides a useful starting place in evaluating trade targets based on extension possibilities.  Draft information comes from DLF Post-Draft Superflex ADP data.   Actual draft position may vary greatly between leagues.

Round 1

The tables below show players with overall and positional ADP, projected positional contract price, and recommendations on whether to extend the player.  The decision to extend really breaks down to if you believe the extension contract is cheaper than the market auction price or value for the player.  The below are general recommendations for extensions as there are a large number of factors to consider including league size, projected salary cap space in the league, the estimated free agent pool, and your own cap/roster situation among many others.   We should also note the NFL salary cap (and with it the RSO cap) is set to explode after the diminished cap effects of the COVID-reduced cap in 2020 are finished working their way through the NFL cap to go along with an eventual revenue boost from the new NFL television deal.  This, in general, makes gambles on extension contracts more palatable.  Many leagues also use the Reality Sports Online rookie option for 1st round draft picks adding an additional year to the contract which would eliminate the 2018 rookies drafted in the first round of your leagues from extension consideration if the GM exercised the option.

There is an extremely limited supply of running backs with the potential touch volume in the rushing and passing game as Barkley.  Coming off an ACL tear with diminished early performance might present lower extension prices and a unique opportunity to take advantage.  Chubb might be the best pure rusher in the NFL.   He’s a solid back-end RB1 but without an elite-level range of outcomes due to his quarterback for the NFL or fantasy football, stuck in the middle.  Mayfield and Darnold are quarterbacks stuck as QB2s in fantasy.  Neither is among the best passers in the NFL nor possesses much rushing upside.  This implies a limited fantasy ceiling that you will likely be able to obtain for less than the probable extension price.  On the other end, Jackson displayed league-winning upside already and a rock-solid borderline QB1 floor with over 1,000 rushing yards each of the last two seasons as a starting quarterback.  The price will be high but worth it in the right fantasy leagues.  Moore possesses all the traits you look for when signing a wide receiver to a long-term contract.  He put up quality production dating back to college with sub-par quarterback play, wins in a variety of ways on multiple levels of the field, and is an excellent athlete to boot.  He might not rack up elite numbers but is a young foundation piece, particularly in deeper leagues, who probably has not hit his prime yet.

Round 2

Ridley is among the best route runners at the wide receiver position and another receiver productive since he entered the NFL.  The only question is whether his extension price will be nearer the elite echelon rather than just an upper-level price.  Kirk and Gallup represent speculative low-cost extensions for players who flashed for decent portions of their rookie contracts and probably will be with new teams next season.  The reasons for extending Sutton mirror that of Moore.  Sutton is a prototype dominant X receiver with quality production despite awful quarterback play.  I was hoping a slow start coming off his ACL-tear last year would drive down his price but that might not happen now with Jeudy out.  Allen locked up a massive extension coming off a MVP-type 2020 season.  I don’t think it is reasonable to expect that type of production going forward but his rushing skills and massive arm give him one of the highest weekly ceilings among quarterbacks.  The extension price might push into the very top of the position which could make for a difficult decision.  Gesicki flashed at times but has not developed his route-running to consistently beat good coverage despite his athletic gifts and has shown to be more of a situational matchup player in the NFL.  Those aren’t the type of tight ends that typically get the playing time and target load necessary to produce consistent fantasy points.

Round 3

We might consider Hines a specialty extension candidate as a passing game specialist whose role doesn’t change much no matter if the lead is injured.  Indianapolis just extended him so there is some security.  Consider extending Hines in deeper leagues.  Everyone waits for the Eagles to finally move on from Ertz and give Goedert the opportunity he deserves as a top-6 PFF tight end each of his first three seasons.  He could get that chance during his second contract but it might now be for a different team as the Eagles somehow have not extended him.    Many people mistakenly thought Chark could morph into a potentially high target receiver after a breakout 2019 season propped up by a limited receiver room and an easy schedule.  The reality is his skills translate better as a complimentary deep receiving option for an NFL team.  The extension price will likely be too high for RSO GMs wanting to take a gamble on him.  While Andrews projects at the higher end of extension contracts for tight ends, it probably won’t be at the very top.  He just signed a massive contract extension in Baltimore and is one of the only proven receiving weapons for the Ravens.  The Baltimore offense caps the ceiling for Andrews but he is still one of the few tight ends who likely averages 5-6 targets a game.


Bio:  Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics.  He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time.  Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

More Analysis by Bernard Faller

RSO Roster Construction: Player Tier Variation

Updated: August 26th 2021

The question of optimal roster construction remains a mystery to many in RSO leagues.  How much should I allocate to different position groups?  How is the allocation distributed within each position?  How much should go to projected starters versus backups?  There exists practically near-limitless player combinations available to RSO teams and we can’t hope to cover any reasonable fraction of those.  This article gives a few examples of what various rosters can look like based on allocation of salary cap to different tiers of players.  The article utilizes average salary data taken from 2021 RSO startup auctions in order to construct 20-player rosters fitting near the RSO salary cap limits.  I assume 1QB/1SF/2RB/2WR and 1 or 2 flex spots in the starting lineup for this exercise.   I also allocated the same number of roster spots at each position for all rosters as a consistency measure.

The goal of this article is not to recommend individual players or even which type of roster construction is best.  League settings and conditions will have a big impact on the type of roster you desire on auction day.  The article does provide a starting point in evaluating different types of roster builds and the sort of trade-offs one must take into account when choosing how your team is constructed by examining a few rosters with differing cap distributions among players.

Top-Tier Heavy Roster

This roster pays a premium for the top contracts at each position.  The top-4 players combined for about 60% of the salary cap.  Interestingly, that number is significantly down from 2020.  This top-4 contracts would have cost about 75% of a team’s total salary last season.  These top-tier players show the most certainty in production which means this roster construction profile puts most of the cap dollars in highly reliable players.  The hope for this type of team resides in exploiting the consistent week-winning upside of the high priced players while getting just enough production from lower priced players.  The team has potential for extremely high weekly production in shallow leagues if it gets lucky and hits on one or two low-priced, low-probability players while avoiding injury.  The depth at wide receiver is a major plus for this strategy as low-priced viable options and young upside players exist throughout the lower price spectrum to fill a roster.  That strategy gets murkier as the number of required starters increases when more “hits” on questionable players are needed to produce a winning lineup.

The main issue with a team constructed this way is that many roster spots are filled with minimum salary and other low-cost players with very small odds of significant fantasy production.  There is little chance of seeing much value increases from these players.  Most trades will necessarily involve moving one of the prized star players to help alleviate any team deficiencies.  Any injury or underperformance of your star players is also a major issue for a team like this as there simply isn’t going to be a viable replacement in most cases.

Starter Heavy Roster

This roster variation divests cap dollars away from the very top-tier players to a degree.  Most of our salary is still allocated to the starters but is more evenly divided among them.  We can see that secondary starters see significant potential upgrades over the previous top-tier heavy roster and this roster type ensures a premium starter at the “start two” positions even in the case of injury.  The main question for teams utilizing this strategy is how they view the secondary starters.  The move away from the top-paid players may well be worth the cost if an owner sees potential top-tier production in the next tier of players.  There is also a depth cost to be paid with this build as the difference in price from top-tier downward is not as drastic as last season.

Balanced Roster

This distribution notably puts more cap dollars in potential flex starters and bench players.  The power of the middle-tier running backs this season, in particular, is highlighted.  Typically the “avoid zone” for running backs, the infusion of young running backs at the position recently allows for more flexibility in roster construction.  The flatter cap distribution approach displays two primary benefits.  First, the roster offers enhanced injury mitigation.  Unavailability of even the best players on this roster will potentially have a more diminished effect.  The statistical projections between players are less as the salary gap narrows.  There is a certain amount of “plug and play” replacement aspect here.  An RSO GM should feel fairly good about the weekly starting lineup, even on bye weeks.  Second, this type of roster construction acknowledges the inherent randomness in statistical production.  New coaching, surrounding personnel, schemes, schedules, etc. have major impacts on the fantasy performance of players.  Dividing money to more players allows additional chances on players with reasonable chances of significantly out-producing respective salaries.   There exists a good chance one of the backups produces at starter-quality as a replacement for an underperforming projected starter.

The downside to this build is a team will usually not have the potential weekly upside using this roster methodology compared to more concentrated distributions.  Even when many of the questionable players exceed expectations, they are unlikely to achieve truly top-tier production levels and many may not make your starting lineup.  This becomes less of a concern as in deeper leagues as more of the “hits” can be utilized on a weekly basis.


Bio:  Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics.  He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time.  Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

More Analysis by Bernard Faller

2021 RSO Contracts: TEs

Updated: August 16th 2021

My annual look at RSO auction values moves to tight ends.  The series was designed to give the reader help in planning for upcoming auctions by looking at actual RSO auctions already finished this year.  The data comes from a variety of different types of leagues with varying scoring rules and starting requirements which can drastically alter player values so be cautious in expecting values to match your particular league.  The information does provide a useful starting point for examining how RSO owners value players at a certain position relative to one another and the length of contract they are willing to invest.  Provided fantasy stats and rankings utilize per game PPR scoring.

Average RSO Tight End Contracts

Top Tier Contracts

It’s extremely difficult making a realistic argument against Kansas City tight end Travis Kelce as the top fantasy option at the position.  He finished as the fantasy TE1 each of the last FIVE seasons and is getting better, averaging over 100 receptions and 1,300 yards during the last three years.  Those are numbers a fantasy player would salivate over from their top wide receiver.  His situation with Mahomes projects as the top situation for fantasy.  The only minor question for Kelce is whether age (nearing 32) eventually takes a toll on his performance.  Pitts is the culmination of a dominating college player and athletic phenom taken as the highest-drafted tight end ever.  Rookie fantasy production is historically a horror story at tight end for even the best prospects but he won’t play much inline as one of the most skilled receiving talents ever drafted for the position.  Kittle ranked as PFF’s top tight end in 2018 and 2019 while still ranking fourth in an injury-riddled 2020.  The 49er star produces high efficiency receiving yardage thanks, in part, to being one of best at accumulating yards after the catch and scored 15 points per game each of the last three years finishing as the TE3 or better each season.  Waller produced another huge year after his breakout 2019 season.  The former college wide receiver particularly dominated the last seven games averaging almost 8 receptions and 110 yards per game.  The field could open up even more for Waller if second year receivers Ruggs and Edwards expand their games.

The Middle

Andrews finished as a top-five tight end the last two seasons thanks largely to seven and ten touchdown years.  The Ravens significantly upgraded the nearly non-existent wide receiver core through free agency (Watkins) and the draft (Bateman).  Baltimore’s Jackson-led, run-heavy offense limits the target potential and ceiling for the pass catching tight end.  Hockenson made a big second year leap essentially doubling his rookie year receiving totals.  A bare receiving group on a rebuilding Lions team with a quarterback in Goff who prefers short and intermediate throws open up immense target potential for the third year player.  Most people assumed Ertz would be gone from Philadelphia leaving the tight end position to Goedert and a potential fantasy breakout.  The fourth year pro graded as a top-10 tight end each of his first three seasons per PFF.  Ertz is surprisingly still on the Eagles making any breakout suspect as of now on a team with questionable quarterback play.

Take your Chances

Most of the players for the rest of this article could easily find themselves in the mid TE1 range all the way down to the lower TE2 group.  The difference from TE5 to TE25 was less than four points per game.  Prepare for weekly matchup plays if going with a few guys from this group.  The athletic Gesicki finished with career bests in receptions, yardage, and touchdowns.  Miami massively upgraded the wide receiver group with Fuller and Waddle while also using mid-range draft capital on another tight end leaving Gesicki’s role unknown moving forward.  Thomas benefitted from a dangerously thin wide receiver group in Washington with very risk-averse quarterback play for 110 targets in 2020.  Thomas barely averaged six yards per target and Washington also significantly upgraded the wide receiver group which dampens his expectations going forward.  Tonyan is the poster-child for touchdown regression after a ludicrous 11 touchdowns on just 59 targets for the TE5 finish.

There are a lot of moving parts in New England with completely different offensive philosophies depending on the quarterback.  Does Hunter Henry or Jonnu Smith carve out significant fantasy roles on a team without much in established wide receivers?  How much of a role can Irv Smith take on a run-heavy Minnesota team with two established quality wide receivers, even if he earns the third receiving option?  Engram projects for a smaller portion of the pass game with the Giants signing Kenny Golladay in free agency as the primary receiving option for a team with questionable quarterback play.  The Rams let Gerald Everett go in free agency and get an upgrade at quarterback with Matt Stafford opening up more possibilities for Higbee in the passing game.  Does Ertz remain in Philadelphia on a team with lots of questions at wide receiver and quarterback after a disastrous 2020?  Trautman has a golden opportunity to establish himself as a difference-making tight end on a team that let Jared Cook go and, with Michael Thomas out for at least a significant portion of the season, no established wide receivers.

Cleveland paid Hooper a lot of money in free agency last season but he finds himself in a run-heavy offense with lots of other dynamic receiving weapons and a deep tight end group.   Tampa Bay possesses perhaps the best receiving group in the NFL which puts future hall of famer Gronkowski squarely in the weekly upside touchdown-dependent streaming camp.  There is a chance for Kmet as a significant receiving option in Chicago.  Hurst finished as a mid-range TE2 last season on a team that essentially swaps Julio Jones for rookie Kyle Pitts with a new coach who utilized two-tight end formations at the highest rate in the NFL for Tennessee last year.  Everett played well in Los Angeles but didn’t get the chance for fantasy production with another good tight end.  The dynamic former second-round pick gets a quarterback upgrade and a shot as the clear third receiving option in Seattle.  Cook consistently puts up more yards than your average weekly matchup play thanks to his unusual deep threat ability at tight end where he posted at least 11.9 yards per reception each season after his rookie year.


Bio:  Bernard Faller has degrees in engineering and economics.  He currently lives in Las Vegas and enjoys athletics, poker, and fantasy football in his free time.  Send your questions and comments (both good and bad) on Twitter @BernardFaller1.

 

More Analysis by Bernard Faller